| 
 
 | 
   
    |  |  |  |   
    | The Other Woman
    
    Author: redleg112 |   
    |  | (Added on Mar 20, 2002)
            (This month 74191 readers) (Total 94303 readers) |   
    |  | This is a parallel story to author's another story Dr. Benson's Office - wife's revenge. |  
 
   
    | Ratings and Reviews: |   
    | Number 
      of Ratings: 4 | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |  
| 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 0% |  |   
    | Weighed
      Average (?):  (6/10) |   
    | Average 
      Rating:  (6.5/10) |   
    | Highest 
      Rating:  (8/10) |   
    | Lowest 
      Rating:  (4/10) |  
 
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    mkemse
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Nov 9, 2007 |   
    |  | Yes, the story is in very, very bad need of proof reading, but despite this, i realy enojed the story, like it better then Dr. Benson's office, but it may be becuae this deals with a female victim and not a male victim, I am not much into Femdom, but still a good story, hope there arre other to cum (8/10) 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    errol42
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Apr 29, 2002 |   
    |  | Very poorly written (4/10) 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    beta
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Mar 22, 2002 |   
    |  | Fine erotic story. Lots of good elements. Badly in need of proof reading. I suggest that the author either proof read it once himself, or ask a volunteer to do it for him. Even professional authors use proof readers. Still, the story hits on some nice humiliation and tease and denial. I hope it's continued. (8/10) 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    hyphen666
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Mar 20, 2002 |   
    |  | Let me once more observe that the author seems to enjoy doing him or herself in through incredibly bad grammar, punctutation, spelling and general disregard for the basic rules of the english, or should I say american language. This is very unfortunate since the author certainly  has the ability to tell a good story. (5/10) 
 |  |  |