|
|
|
|
|
The Uncut
Author: Dee Driscoll
|
| |
(Added on May 28, 2006)
(This month 51897 readers) (Total 64285 readers) |
| |
A suburban soccer-mom ends up raped inside her own home by a couple of teenagers from the neighbourhood. Not only that it contains sickness-inducing violent sex but also extensive frivolous dialogue, introspective monologue and even the chapter titles are all titles of popular songs. Well, popular in my CD player at least. But they are all real, google if you don\'t believe me. |
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 5 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 0% |
0% |
20% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
20% |
0% |
60% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (8/10) |
Average
Rating:  (8.5/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (10/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (3/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jul 17, 2008 |
| |
not real sure whast to make of it, almost as if you tried to put to much int onoe story
I re read it, not bad at all (8/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Dee Driscoll
(Edit) (May 28, 2006)
- Well, I certainly did... Anyway, you got past that first chapter which I should definitely give you kudos for.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
tessa
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 13, 2007 |
| |
What an outstandingly smart read! Every word where and how it should be. My deepest appreciation for keeping it rather brutal throughout the story. This isn't the type tale to be prettied up at the conclusion in order to appease the sensibilities. If one wants romance, look elsewhere. Thankfully, I looked here. (10/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Dee Driscoll
(Edit) (Feb 16, 2007)
- Oh... thanks... hehehe... Nope, not a romantic story, most definitely... More like a jovial critique of modern Hollywood and pop culture disguising itself as porn... or is it? Thanks, I appreciate your kind words.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
H Dean
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jun 1, 2006 |
| |
I really don't know what to say about this story. I'm exhausted from the reading. I guess, I will start with the technical aspects which, with few exceptions, were quite sound. The story flowed well and the story telling was clean and vivid. The main assailant was excellently portrayed and I really enjoyed the "frivolous" dialog. I can't say that I found the story to be erotic and I wouldn't recomend it for people simply seeking a good jerk-off tale. On the other hand, for something less mainstream, this is an excellent read. (10/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Dee Driscoll
(Edit) (Jun 2, 2006)
- Hahaha, 'less mainstream', I guess that's a good way to call this. Thanks, Dean, this is a very fair review.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
ascot8111
(Edit) |
Rating: |
May 29, 2006 |
| |
This is amazing. Holden Caufield does rape. Yeah, it might not do it for many readers of this library, but they're just here to get a wank on right off the bat. Maybe you can highlight the wank parts in red so they can skip right to them.
This is hands-down the best-written story I've ever run into in this library. You need to be published, in this genre or regular fiction. (10/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Dee Driscoll
(Edit) (May 29, 2006)
- Haha, thanks, ascot8111, glad to see someone actually likes this shit of mine. Yeah, it's true, there's a decent portion of 'wank-worthy' stuff here (if I may say so myself) but you do have to fight your way through some, um, non-porn first... But in my vanity I'd even venture as far as to say that all of it has a function in this story and that without either of the parts it wouldn't really be complete.
I'd like to say that a comparison with HC made me proud but, not being anglophone I have never read any of his stuff and only know his name from references in second rate sitcoms and funny punk rock records. Still, thanks for such nice words...
- Replied by:
H Dean
(Edit) (Jun 1, 2006)
- Hilariously put, Ascot811.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
magnum
(Edit) |
Rating: |
May 29, 2006 |
| |
Extensive frivolous dialogue was certainly right. And the reference to "popular songs" means nothing to me, as you are obviously into a diffrent genre than am I. I tried, but I just couldn't wade through it to get to what I read here for. (3/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Dee Driscoll
(Edit) (May 29, 2006)
- Yeah, well, thanks for the effort anyway, magnum, even though you quit before getting to the fun part. I appreciate the opinion of course. (And, btw, obviously, most of the songtitles were chosen because they sound funny, not because you should play spot-a-song-you-know in there. So it's all good.)
|
|
|
About 