|
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 6 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
33% |
0% |
33% |
33% |
0% |
0% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (6.5/10) |
Average
Rating:  (7/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (8/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (5/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
e.e. norcod
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Mar 6, 2004 |
| |
First, I thought "The Whipping Girl" was an excellent story, a good bit different than the average story on this site. A bit more intellectual than most but with good graphic detail and color.<br>Second, yes the story could have used a bit more polish. But the sort of on line posting that this site uses makes it difficult to get the sort of peer editing that would eliminate the grammatical jitters. I would be happy to, in the future, do a quick once over for this author if they write further material for submission to this site.<br>Good work, keep it up. (8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
ladys_maid
(Edit) |
Rating: |
May 18, 2003 |
| |
The idea behind this story holds promise but that promise has not been delivered on (yet?). There is little characterization that would have fleshed out the story and allowed the reader to better empathize with the master and slave. Nevertheless, it is still an enjoyable, exciting read and I hope there will be a sequel to fill in some of the blanks left by this story. (5/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
anguisette
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 3, 2003 |
| |
i quite enjoyed the concept of this story, but i fear i cannot rate it higher than passable. the problem is....grammar! it's not hard these days to write a grammatically sound piece, people....use the bloody spell-check on your computer. most are well-equipped to pick up grammatical errors as well as spelling. and if that doesn't work, for crying out loud, have somebody proofread for you. nothing ruins a potentially fabulous story more for me than glaring errors. (5/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Moggy
(Edit) (Apr 13, 2003)
- I'm surprised you were so critical about this one. I just re-read it, and think the standard is better than many on this site; although I concede it is a little quirky in parts.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Moggy
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Mar 25, 2003 |
| |
A very good standard of writing with a degree of eroticism.
If the story was longer with a little more characterisation I'm sure I would have rated it higher. (7/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Tim_Id
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Mar 22, 2003 |
| |
A fine piece about total submission without sex. (8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
williampeter
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Mar 21, 2003 |
| |
I liked the way it flowed along, it was about the right length for my taste. I look forward to further chapters. (7/10)
|
|
|
About 